On this page
Published by horak. Attorneys at law / Patent attorneys
Archive · First published 2018-08-22. Editorial revision: 12 November 2026. The original date is retained; the text below distinguishes historical context from present-day application.
Technology matters require both a clear legal analysis and an accurate understanding of the system or transaction. Contract terms, technical descriptions and evidence should tell a consistent story.
How to use this archived article
Our current service pages explain the work involved in technology contracting, data and AI regulation, public procurement and disputes. They replace the earlier general promotional statements with specific areas of assistance.
Questions for a current matter
Which contractual version and legal regime apply? What happened, when did the parties become aware of it, and which documents preserve the relevant facts? Identify the desired outcome and any procedural deadline before choosing a response.
Four practical examples
Illustrative scenarios, not reports of client mandates. The appropriate response depends on the facts and applicable law.
Conflicting schedules
The order form and service terms contain different liability limits. We clarify precedence and negotiate a coherent position.
One-sided standard terms
A supplier excludes nearly all remedies. We assess enforceability and workable alternatives.
International rollout
A group imports a foreign software template. We review German-law issues and local implementation.
Undefined acceptance
A developer seeks payment when work is complete but the customer expects testing. We specify acceptance and payment milestones.